A 2013 poll found that over 74 per cent of Norwegians want to keep their alcohol monopoly in place…

Xander Brett

In 1995 Harry Franzén, a grocer from Röstangå in southern Sweden, was persecuted for selling wine in his store. Franzén cited Articles 30 and 37 of the EU Constitution and took his case all the way to the European Court of Justice. Its decision: Systembolaget, the government-owned alcohol store, could continue its retail monopoly. Franzén was forbidden to sell wine. Sweden has a heavy-handed welfare state, but is also one of the world’s most liberal nations, so it’s perhaps strange such a system persists.

In the nineteenth century, in Sweden, brännvin (distilled liquor) saw increased production, to such an extent the king even had to get involved. A referendum in 1922 advised Sweden’s government by 51 per cent not to impose total prohibition (like the other Nordic countries), so rationing was introduced instead. This persisted until 1955 and required each citizen carry a motbok, in which a stamp was added for each purchase. Naturally, people often used their friends’ or even strangers’ books as a way round, and the system died out quietly.

“In the nineteenth century, in Sweden, brännvin (distilled liquor) saw increased production, to such an extent the king even had to get involved.”

Norway had prohibition for a few years. Vinmonopolet was established in 1922 to deal with trade reflexes, allowing Norwegians to buy wine only in selected outlets. Surveys from the mid-1990s show most Norwegians favoured dissolving the arrangement but, after restructuring in 1996, public opinion increased two-fold. A 2009 survey showed that 88 per cent of people are now satisfied with the company, and a 2013 Gallup poll projected that 74 per cent of the population wanted to keep the monopoly. Economists praise the company, particularly the number of products it offers.

This article is a Fika Online exclusive.